Next: Secular precession of pericenter
Up: First integrals and osculating
Previous: First integrals and osculating
In this section we consider the
potential
This potential differs from the potential of the Kepler motion by the term
in which we will assume that is small. However, the potential has still the spherical symmetry of the Kepler motion.
This potential leads to the new equation of motion
Hence, the perturbing force is
Clearly, is a central force (
) and we
have
and
In particular, since is constant, the force does not change the plane of the orbit.
We now compute in a convenient coordinate system.
Assume that the pericenter is aligned with the axis at the
instant for which we do the computations. Then
where is the scalar angular momentum of the orbit (conserved).
We also have
and also
Direct computation of cross products yields
|
(29) |
Now this is a difficult differential equation for , since of course meeds to observe the equation of motion. On the other hand since is small and is typically rather large, we see that will change relatively slowly, compared with the change of location of the body. Since the change of
is small, it is sufficient to know its change over a whole orbit instead of its instantaneous change. In other words we average the perturbation over the entire orbit.
In simple terms we have a differential equation of the form
where is a first integral of the unperturbed motion (e.g., an
orbital element which is constant for an orbit). When ,
i.e., there is no perturbation, is a constant, . In
principle, should be computed using the perturbed orbit
on which is not constant. This would make the computation
very difficult. Instead, since the changes in are small for a
single orbit, we take the approximation
We then get
The right hand side can be computed, with some effort.
We also observe the following. Since is function evaluated
on a periodic orbit, it is also periodic, with the orbital period.
We can define decomposition
where is the average of for an orbit, and
is whatever left of . In other words,
and
Clearly, we must have that
Then, we have
The first term on the right hand side gives a linear trend in time,
as so-called secular perturbation in . The second term
gives purely periodic, so-called short-period perturbations.
We are usually much more interested in the secular perturbations
than in the short-period ones. Note, that instead of time, we can
use a linear function of time, for instance the mean anomaly
to compute . In other words, we also have
In the following section we will apply this idea to the Laplace vector.
Next: Secular precession of pericenter
Up: First integrals and osculating
Previous: First integrals and osculating
Werner Horn
2006-06-06