- DRAFT Report Outline
- Lodestar 10/5/00
- Program Implementation: October 2000
- Did the program reach the target teachers?
- API rankings
- Student population
- Grade levels
- Add other descriptive information on participants, e.g., breakdown by gender, ethnicity, years teaching, etc.
- Did teachers attend the program regularly?
- Attendance by teacher at the four-week program
- Attendance by teacher at the follow-up sessions (how many offered?)
- Did teachers find the program useful / satisfactory?
- Teacher evaluation forms
- Program Immediate Impact
- Did the program improve teachers' content understanding?
- Biology: pre/post
- Geology: pre/post
- Under what circumstances is the program most effective in improving teachers' content understanding?
- Biology & Geology individual pre/post tests by variables including:
- attendance at the four-week session & follow-up sessions
- grade level
- gender
- ethnicity
- years teaching
- credential status
- prior NSF program participation
- subject taught
- college degree
- college major
- Did teachers utilize their new knowledge in the classroom?
- December form
- Did teachers share their new knowledge with other teachers at their school?
- December form
- Did teachers also improve skills & techniques?
- Skills in scientific inquiry
- Knowledge of lab techniques
- Effective instructional techniques
- Program Outcomes
- Did workshops truly enhance content understanding of all participants?
- Second post-test completed xx months after program completion
- Will high quality classroom implementation occur?
- On-site observation by scientist
- Will these teachers become science leaders who can provide quality in-service training for their colleagues?
- December form
- Really only answerable by getting information from other science teachers or
- the administrator at their school