Criteria |
Ineffective (0) |
Adequate (1) |
Above Average (2) |
Exceptional (3) |
Organization
Theoretical understanding
|
No
evidence of organization or connection between the Whole Child Campaign
and emerging knowledge from neurobiological science.
No
framework or outline
No
apparent sequence |
Somewhat organized, but lacks cohesiveness and flow between the Whole
Child Campaign and emerging knowledge from neurobiological science;
Reflects the presence of an outline and sequence for presenting new and
convincing information |
Well-organized with clearly-presented evidence of cohesiveness between
the Whole Child Campaign and emerging knowledge from neurobiological
science.
Reflects a coherent outline and sequence for presenting new and
convincing information |
Exceptionally well organized with clearly-presented evidence of
cohesiveness between the Whole Child Campaign and emerging knowledge
from neurobiological science.
Presentation reflects a coherent outline and sequence for presenting new
and convincing information |
Quality & Creativity of Presentation
Educational awareness |
Group appears to have little educational awareness of the topic;
unprepared or lack communication among team members.
Poorly paced, uninspired or un-dimensional delivery of information. |
Group appears to have some educational awareness of the topic;
demonstrates basic preparation and communication among team members.
Attempts to create some interest in the topic by including visual as
well as verbal information. |
Creative use of hands-on materials are interesting and provide
evidence that the team has strong educational awareness of the topic;
Group creates interesting learning atmosphere in which audience is
"hooked" and engaged with creative, but also clear and concise delivery
of information. |
Highly creative use of hands-on materials and research information
provides strong evidence that the team has well-developed educational
awareness of the topic;
Exceptional, interesting presentation promotes an opportunity for
audience to become involved in critically thinking about the topic and
its implication for their teaching and learning. |
Engaged Learning Practices
Teacher Leadership
|
Presentation fails to use more than one model or dimension of
instruction. |
Presentation addresses least two different models or dimensions of
instruction. |
Uses several techniques that incorporate a variety of models or
dimension of instruction thereby gearing presentation to several
learning styles. |
Clearly and innovatively gears presentation to a variety of learning
styles by incorporating a variety of models or dimension of instruction. |
Quality of information
Presented
Reflective practice |
Erroneous, unclear, or irrelevant topic;
Unsupported information with little connection to the research/theory
base |
Somewhat relevant topic and information
Unclear or unsupported at times. |
Topic selected is current, relevant information
Good, supportive resources
Clear presentation of information |
Topic selected is current, relevant; interesting information presented
in understandable formats
Well researched with numerous sources cited |
Group Effectiveness
|
Not
cohesive/disjointed
Unequal distribution of work |
All
members participate but overall presentation is ineffective |
Effective presentation
Good cooperative effort |
Effective presentation
Evidence that all group members made significant contributions |
Team Members: ______________ _____________ _____________ Total
Rubric Score: _____ / 15 |