Appendix-1: A
Final Note on Tree Diagramming
For reasons having to do with the myriad of texts currently available
on grammar, along with their multifaceted approach to pedagogy,
much of the tree diagramming, structure, and examples have been
keyed to earlier grammar texts which have arisen out of the tradition
of Transformational Grammar (TG). It goes with out saying that TG
has greatly changed since then. Therefore, the Chomskyan tree diagrams
as presented herein are somewhat out of sink with today's working
conception of how theoretical syntax should be diagrammed. In deference
of traditional treatments of diagramming, it remains important to
stress that even Chomsky himself, at various times, says that much
of the debate behind how one should go about diagramming a syntactic
structure amounts to little more than notations squabbles. Such
inherent misunderstands have, in the past, even spawned new syntactic
theories. In any event, a Chomskyan style tree has evolved over
the life of the theory and can be more accurately characterized
in the following manner: (S)entence: CP>IP>VP with
DP (=N) and IP (=V) taking over the roles of functional to lexical
categorical status (respectively) in place of the earlier (S)entence
= [NP+VP]. A CP denotes the Complementizer Phrase--a
phrase headed by a complement (of a verb) or an Auxiliary/Modal
which precedes the Subject. An IP denotes Inflectional Phrase--a
phrase which houses the Inflection features of the Main Verb. In
one basic sense, the CP has arisen out of the need to generate a
phrase which sits higher up (in the syntactic tree) from the IP
(where the IP is seen as hosting the subject of a declarative sentence).
For example, Auxiliary inversion, Wh-movement, other possible adjuncts
which may be base-generated lower within an IP which now sit on
top of the IP required the instantiation of a CP. The following
Tree Diagrams (current to date) come out of Andrew Radford's new
text Syntactic theory and the structure of English (1997)
and Radford et al.'s (1999) Linguistics: An Introduction.
Consider the newly revamped tree diagrams below:
(A-1)
(A-2)
|