http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-insurance27may27,1,7214822.story?coll=la-headlines-business&ctrack=1&cset=true
ID Theft Coverage Draws Criticism
Activists say insurers, which share data, are profiting from a need
they helped create.
By David Colker
Times Staff Writer
May 27, 2005
After someone used Robert Nighan's credit card to charge $2,000 worth
of golf clubs in California, the insurance executive got an idea.
Nighan — who doesn't golf and lives in Hartford, Conn. — figured out a
way to legally make crime pay: Sell an insurance policy to protect
against identity theft.
"I was involved in our crime insurance division at the time," said
Nighan, a vice president of insurer St. Paul Travelers Cos. "What
happened to me was relatively minor; it took only about a week to fix.
Still, it was a major distraction, and for some victims it goes on for
years."
So in 1999, St. Paul Travelers became the first company to offer
identity theft insurance. It cost $25 as an option to a homeowner
policy and covered the costs involved in fixing credit report problems
in the wake of a crime.
The idea took off and other companies followed.
"Our anti-fraud people say it is one of the fastest-growing areas,"
said Bryon Tucker, spokesman for the National Assn. of Insurance
Commissioners. Companies offering the coverage include Allstate Corp.,
American International Group Inc., Chubb Corp., Fireman's Fund
Insurance Co. and MetLife Inc.
Neither the National Assn. of Insurance Commissioners nor insurance
trade associations keep figures on the number of identity theft
policies in effect, partly because the area is relatively new.
Some critics complain that the insurance companies are profiting off a
problem they helped create. Like many businesses, insurance companies
give or sell information about their customers to data aggregators such
as ChoicePoint Inc., which had its database breached by identity
thieves and sparked a national debate over how personal information
gets used.
"The unpleasant irony is that one of the main reasons we need
protection is that actions by insurance companies helped make our
personal information too readily available," said Doug Heller,
executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights,
a consumer advocacy group based in Santa Monica. "They and other
industries insist on their right to trade private information about all
of us, and that makes it possible that the information can fall into
the hands of thieves."
Insurance companies say the information helps them better evaluate the
risks associated with individual policyholders, allowing them to offer
more equitable rates.
Rather than rely on insurance, Heller and other activists said,
consumers should demand tougher laws regulating how their personal data
are used.
California has led the country in anti-identity-theft laws. It was the
first to require that information brokers notify state residents if
their personal information might have been revealed to scammers as the
result of a database break-in. The state's law was seen as key to the
disclosure of the breach at ChoicePoint.
Only five other states have notification laws as strong as California's
— Arkansas, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota and Washington — according
to the Public Interest Research Group.
Another law pioneered in California lets residents control access to
their credit reports. This helps keep scammers from opening
unauthorized credit card accounts or taking out loans in a victim's
name. Only Louisiana has a credit-freeze law as strong as California's.
The insurance generally costs $25 or more per year. Policies don't
cover the cost of items bought in the victim's name. But those costs
are usually covered by the credit card company if the crime is reported.
Some companies include the coverage free on premium home insurance
policies. And a few even allow victims to turn over the tedious and
sometimes thorny task of fixing their credit status to a business that
specializes in the field.
John Spagnuolo, director of new media for the Insurance Information
Institute, a trade association, said he expected more companies to
offer the coverage.
"Because of all the coverage of the problem in the media, consumers are
aware that the possibility of being a victim of identity theft is not a
small one," he said.
The Federal Trade Commission has put the number of yearly victims of
identity theft at about 10 million, or nearly 5% of the adult
population in the U.S. The agency estimates that identity theft costs
$50 billion a year in false charges and lost time.
Consumer advocate Heller experienced the hassle associated with
identity theft when someone used his wife's name to buy numerous items,
including $600 worth of furniture at Sears. The thief gave a home
address to the store to have it delivered, establishing a trail for the
police to follow.
"Not the brightest thief in the world," Heller said. "But he sure
caused a lot of trouble."
Four years later, the Hellers are still trying to get their credit
report back in order.
Stories like Heller's help sell policies, said Bob Hunter, director of
the insurance division of the Consumer Federation of America in
Washington.
"Insurance companies love to play on fear," Hunter said. "It's a
classic development."
But Beth Givens, head of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, which took
information brokers to task before and after the database infiltration
disclosures of ChoicePoint and others, said identity theft insurance
might be appropriate in some cases.
"If you are the victim of an especially aggressive thief, there will be
a lot of certified-mail charges, faxes to credit bureaus and notary
fees," she said. "It can add up to $1,000 sometimes. And in rare cases,
you might have to hire a lawyer."
The main cost, though, often is lost time.
"You might have to take days off work, just making phone calls," Givens
said.
Most policies compensate victims for at least some of the time they
have to spend away from work. Coverage backed by an AIG policy, for
example, repays as much as $2,000 in lost wages.
Givens was an unpaid advisor to St. Paul Travelers when the company was
creating its first policy. The insurance company paid Privacy Rights
Clearinghouse a $1,000 licensing fee to use some of the group's
literature in its brochures on the problems and time involved in fixing
credit status in the wake of a crime.
"If you are out of pocket only $25 for coverage," Givens said, "that's
not so bad considering what might happen."
But $25 is about as much as individuals should pay, she said.
"Stand-alone ID theft insurance can cost upward of $125," Givens said.
"Consumers should not be paying that kind of money for the insurance
when they really should be getting protection under the law."